Chesapeake's McClendon Nominated for Worst CEO of the Year

By -
From The Motley Fool:
Why Aubrey McClendon?
  • A $1.1 billion conflict of interest: The market reacted with shock earlier this year when Reuters reported that McClendon borrowed $1.1 billion from three third-party institutions, $500 million of which came from EIG Global Energy Partners, which had also been a large financer for Chesapeake. In securing personal loans from his company's business associate, McClendon exposed himself to a potential conflict of interest, as it's reasonable to expect him to feel pressure to serve EIG's interests in future corporate transactions, potentially at the expense of the best interests of shareholders. For the CEO of a company to put himself in such situation is not a shining example of corporate governance, even if no actual conflict arises. 
  • Failed to anticipate a shift in energy trends: It wasn't a secret that natural gas prices had been falling precipitously in the past year, yet it took McClendon and Chesapeake months to scale back their natural gas production and gear themselves up to produce greater volumes of natural gas liquids and oil. Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS-A  ) (NYSE: RDS-B  ) , Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) , and EnerVest agreed topurchase Chesapeake's Permian Basin assets in mid-September for $3.3 billion as part of $6.9 billion in total asset sales, but it's still late to the game. Canada's largest natural gas producer, EnCana (NYSE: ECA  ) , has been reducing its natural gas asset exposure since February, when it sold a 40% stake in its undeveloped British Columbia assets to Mitsubishi for $2.9 billion.
  • Poor stock performance: Another factor that'll get you nominated to this list of dunce caps is poor stock performance. Mired in scandal and scrambling to sell assets to cover what is usually a robust capital expenditure budget, Chesapeake has seen its share price hammered in 2012, down more than 13%. The broad-based iShares Dow Jones Oil & Gas Index, which includes Chesapeake Energy, is up more than 5% in comparison.
  • Focused on his own interests: We learned in May, again from Reuters, that McClendon was running a $200 million commodities hedge fund on the side from 2004 through 2008 that traded the same commodities that Chesapeake produced. Keep in mind, McClendon was forced into a $552 million margin call and forced to liquidate more or less his entire stake in the company in 2008 because of his personal gambles. Again, can we say conflict of interest?
  • Used the company as a personal piggy bank: If you're an Aubrey McClendon fan, turn away now, because we're going to look at some of the absurd ways McClendon's company has spent money in recent years. According to Reuters, a unit of Chesapeake Energy known as AKM Operations spent some $3 million on personal work for McClendon in 2010, including accounting and engineering work, taking up 15,000 working hours. This is on top of other questionable expenditures, including private use of the company jets as well as a corporate deal worth $36 million to sponsor the Oklahoma City Thunder, the basketball team in which he owns a 19% interest.
Read the rest of the article here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Popular posts from this blog

Fracktivist in Dimock Releases Carefully Edited Video, Refuses to Release the Rest

By -
Image
From Energy in Depth: There is something very strange going on along Carter Road, in Dimock, Pennsylvania, and I’m not speaking of natural gas, methane migration, contamination, litigation or even the extensive water testing there by the EPA and others.  No, I’m talking about a new “Watergate” conspiracy, complete with 18 minutes of missing tape (well, video, actually). It seems the ever-present Green Party member and  naturist   Vera Scroggins  (a/k/a  Vera Duerga ) has posted a video of Craig Sautner meeting with the EPA.  Mysteriously, the video is but 14 seconds in length, cutting off conversation in what is obviously mid-stream.  It raises a question Craig Sautner, like  Ronald Reagan in Kings Row , might have asked, “Where’s the rest of me?’  Carter Road, isn’t Kings Row, of course, (at least not until you arrive at  the mansion Scott Ely, one of the Dimock litigants, is building with his royalty money ), but there appears to be...
Read more

The Second Largest Oil and Gas Merger - Cabot and Cimarex

By -
Image
       Due to investor pressure, the U.S shale drillers are being pushed to improve financial and operational performance after a few years of poor returns. Even though the industry has improved its numbers, when compared to last year, investors still want more to be done for them to earn more money.      That's why two mid-tier shale drillers, Cabot and Climarex, have decided to merge in order to eliminate $100 million in annual costs, which means more money for the investors. This all-stock transaction is valued at about $7.4 billion, which is relatively high for the oil and gas sector.      The new entity will be renamed and the headquarters located in Houston, Texas. Cabot shareholders will own 49.5 percent of the new entity, and Climarex the rest.       The Cimarex-Cabot merger will address the investor's demand for a higher amount of returning cash. The initial plan is to pay a 50-cent-per-share special dividen...
Read more

Do You Know The History of Fracking?

By -
Image
  In 2018, 59% of total oil production in the U.S came from hydraulic fracking, which means it accounted for more than two-thirds of domestically manufactured gas. By 2024, fracking will reach an astounding $68 billion market value! Of course, fracking is not a new drilling method as you can trace it back hundreds of years. That's why we want to consider the history of hydraulic fracturing (fracking). We will be stating historical facts about it and focusing on the major historical occurrences that have influenced modern-day fracking. Pre-Fracking Days The idea of fracking started back in 1862 when Edward A.L. Roberts (Civil War veteran) witnessed Confederate soldiers exploding artillery rounds into a canal that obstructed a battlefield. At the time, Edward A.L. Roberts called it superincumbent fluid tamping. On April 26th, 1865, Edward A.L. Roberts began experimenting with exploding torpedoes, which consisted of lowering a torpedo containing an amount of powder from fifteen to tw...
Read more