EPA Ridiculed For Handling of Pavillion, Wyoming Situation
From National Review Online:
Do you believe the EPA rushed to release a report based on shoddy science in order to negatively influence the public opinion on fracking? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!
Follow @EnergyNewsBlog
Read the whole article here.In December 2011, the EPA released a draft report of a study it conducted in Wyoming, eliciting a furor of media attention. The New York Times reported that “chemicals used to hydraulically fracture rocks in drilling for natural gas in a remote valley in central Wyoming are the likely cause of contaminated local water supplies, federal regulators said.” The Financial Times ran a story headlined “EPA blames fracking for Wyoming pollution.” National Public Radio announced that “for the first time, federal environmental regulators have made a direct link between the controversial drilling practice known as hydraulic fracturing and groundwater contamination.” And the Salt Lake Tribune ran an editorial subtitled “EPA report shows water poisoned.”
In reality, the study conclusively proved no such thing. The research was fundamentally flawed, with the conclusion being derived less from science than from politics.
Do you believe the EPA rushed to release a report based on shoddy science in order to negatively influence the public opinion on fracking? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!
Follow @EnergyNewsBlog