FWAP Asks EPA to Revoke ODNR's Authority to Permit Injection Wells

By -
From FreshWater Accountability Project:
April 16, 2014 — The Ohio Department of Natural Resources is the sole regulator of the horizontal hydraulic fracturing (fracking) industry which includes the permitting of not only fracking itself, but the disposal of its toxic and radioactive waste. As fracking continues to grow in the state, so does the amount of waste, including toxic liquids, solids and semi-solid waste, which is also radioactive to varying degrees. As fracking in Ohio produces millions of gallons of liquid and tons of solid waste, it also accepts frack waste from other states such as Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The ODNR issues permits for the disposal of this waste in Class II injection wells, solid waste dump sites and through various processing and recycling facilities. 
With proof that the ODNR has become captured by the very industry it is supposed to regulate (http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2014/02/kasich-administration-caught-fracking-conspiracy-cover), the Freshwater Accountability Project (FWAP) appealed to the USEPA Region 5 office in Chicago to revoke the ODNR’s ability to permit for injection wells. In their email of March 3, 2014 to the USEPA, FWAP stated, “Please consider this to be the statutorily-required notice that the citizens of Ohio, a/k/a the victims of this sinister, politically compromised and profit-driven plot, are putting the USEPA on notice of potential toxic tort and substantial endangerment damages in which the federal government will share, owing to the agency’s conscious and indifferent approach to the damage to public health and the environment.” 
Since that time it was learned that there are at least 23 different frack waste storage, processing and disposal facilities that were permitted by the ODNR ahead of rules. These permits were issued over the 2013/2014 holiday season it is believed in order to escape public notice and grandfather the facilities in ahead of rules. These poorly regulated facilities would accept frack waste by the billions of gallons and hundreds of thousands of tons, not just from Ohio frack drilling, but from out of state. Whereas the ODNR and the companies see this as a revenue-producing scheme, most Ohioans would find the proposals deeply troubling. By profiting from pollution and taking the fracking industry’s biggest problem and finding a publicly-subsidized solution for it, the Kasich administration is taking the lead in the nation to receive massive amounts of frack waste for short-term industry profit and regulatory agency revenue at the long-term expense of millions of Ohioans. 
“Why should Ohio be designated as the frack waste dumping ground for the industry,” questioned Lea Harper of FWAP. “Not only is this waste toxic and radioactive, it is being treated as non-hazardous. It is not being traced, the radioactivity is not being measured, and it is being dumped all around the state without anyone knowing about it. We are going to end up like Pennsylvania trying to find out where all the frack waste went and how toxic it is after the fact. In the meantime, we are endangering the safety of our water and the health of future generations of Ohioans just to promote a temporary, highly toxic and unregulated industry while our elected officials take their campaign contributions and abandon concern for a healthy environment and economic future for Ohio.” 
The letter to the USEPA Region 5 dated April 14, 2014 goes on to criticize the ODNR for withholding public records that would have allowed local citizens to know of the toxic waste processing and dumping that was being planned for their communities. USEPA was asked to investigate the ODNR for deliberately denying the public the ability to know about frack waste facilities within the 30-day time frame in which permits that are issued are allowed to be appealed. “Because of the diligence of our colleague, Teresa Mills of Community Health and Environmental Justice (CHEJ) and Buckeye Forest Council (BFC), we were able to find out about one major frack waste dumping scheme in Belmont County in time to appeal,” stated Lea Harper. “This facility, if allowed to go into operation, plans to take 600,000 tons of radioactive frack waste per year and dump it on the bare ground – no oversight – no traceability – no responsibility for future pollution of groundwater and air. How can such things happen without the community knowing of the risks? Only because information is withheld, the facts are distorted, and toxicity is not measured and reported. We aren’t even told all that is in frack waste to be able to test for toxicity or know when it shows up in our water and air. People believe that their government and regulatory agencies are protecting them. This is not the case now in Ohio, and people must wake up to that fact.” 
Terry Lodge, attorney for FWAP, reiterates the statement made to the USEPA in the April 14th letter: “We believe the new Ohio statutory scheme violates the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act, along with federal and state sanitary landfill regulations. We aim to hold the ODNR accountable along with the USEPA if there is a failure to act to stem this tide of illicit dumping and disposal. We believe the ODNR has enacted a secret permitting process to serve the industry it is known to promote, most likely at the behest of the Governor through the head of the agency as a political appointee. We want the USEPA to revoke the ODNR’s permitting authority, and we also hope that Governor Kasich is held accountable for his role to allow fracking and its toxic waste dumping to overtake Ohio without necessary rules and regulations in place.” 
Without adequate rules and regulations to measure, track and properly dispose of fracking waste, Ohio could turn into a large superfund site in the future. Ohioans are already subsidizing frack waste disposal costs by allowing its hazardous waste to be disposed of in non-hazardous Class II injection wells. Radioactive frack waste is also going into unmonitored Ohio solid waste disposal sites. Some of it has been illegally dumped on the ground and into surface waters of the state, and this problem will grow as unscrupulous businesses and individuals attempt to profit from the industry. “Ohio should be protecting those who live here rather than promoting those who just want to make profits by exporting Ohio’s gas, destroying its water and then leaving without accountability for toxic cleanup,” asserted Lea Harper. “Someone needs to intervene to do the right thing. We hope it is the USEPA because obviously Ohio is not going to receive protection from within its own regulatory and legislative bodies.” 
For more information, a copy of the USEPA letter and a list of the 23 sites permitted, make contact throughwww.FWAP.org or email wewantcleanwater@gmail.com.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Popular posts from this blog

Fracktivist in Dimock Releases Carefully Edited Video, Refuses to Release the Rest

By -
Image
From Energy in Depth: There is something very strange going on along Carter Road, in Dimock, Pennsylvania, and I’m not speaking of natural gas, methane migration, contamination, litigation or even the extensive water testing there by the EPA and others.  No, I’m talking about a new “Watergate” conspiracy, complete with 18 minutes of missing tape (well, video, actually). It seems the ever-present Green Party member and  naturist   Vera Scroggins  (a/k/a  Vera Duerga ) has posted a video of Craig Sautner meeting with the EPA.  Mysteriously, the video is but 14 seconds in length, cutting off conversation in what is obviously mid-stream.  It raises a question Craig Sautner, like  Ronald Reagan in Kings Row , might have asked, “Where’s the rest of me?’  Carter Road, isn’t Kings Row, of course, (at least not until you arrive at  the mansion Scott Ely, one of the Dimock litigants, is building with his royalty money ), but there appears to be...
Read more

The Second Largest Oil and Gas Merger - Cabot and Cimarex

By -
Image
       Due to investor pressure, the U.S shale drillers are being pushed to improve financial and operational performance after a few years of poor returns. Even though the industry has improved its numbers, when compared to last year, investors still want more to be done for them to earn more money.      That's why two mid-tier shale drillers, Cabot and Climarex, have decided to merge in order to eliminate $100 million in annual costs, which means more money for the investors. This all-stock transaction is valued at about $7.4 billion, which is relatively high for the oil and gas sector.      The new entity will be renamed and the headquarters located in Houston, Texas. Cabot shareholders will own 49.5 percent of the new entity, and Climarex the rest.       The Cimarex-Cabot merger will address the investor's demand for a higher amount of returning cash. The initial plan is to pay a 50-cent-per-share special dividen...
Read more

Do You Know The History of Fracking?

By -
Image
  In 2018, 59% of total oil production in the U.S came from hydraulic fracking, which means it accounted for more than two-thirds of domestically manufactured gas. By 2024, fracking will reach an astounding $68 billion market value! Of course, fracking is not a new drilling method as you can trace it back hundreds of years. That's why we want to consider the history of hydraulic fracturing (fracking). We will be stating historical facts about it and focusing on the major historical occurrences that have influenced modern-day fracking. Pre-Fracking Days The idea of fracking started back in 1862 when Edward A.L. Roberts (Civil War veteran) witnessed Confederate soldiers exploding artillery rounds into a canal that obstructed a battlefield. At the time, Edward A.L. Roberts called it superincumbent fluid tamping. On April 26th, 1865, Edward A.L. Roberts began experimenting with exploding torpedoes, which consisted of lowering a torpedo containing an amount of powder from fifteen to tw...
Read more