Court Rules That Ohio Law Allows Chesapeake Energy to Cut Landowner Royalties
From Reuters:
To learn more about the creative accounting that Chesapeake uses to slash landowner royalties as much as possible, click here to read ProPublica's investigative report from 2013.
Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!
Follow @EnergyNewsBlog
A U.S. District Court in Akron has ruled that Ohio law allows energy companies to deduct fees from payments to royalty holders whose contracts set a value at the well site, settling a widely-followed case involving Chesapeake Energy.
The decision defined for the first time what Ohio law means when it says value of energy in such contracts is established “at the well.” Plaintiffs in the lawsuit had sought class action status and other royalty cases have alleged improper deductions based on the ‘at the well’ language.
Ohio has become the sixth largest natural gas producer in the United States because of the discovery in recent decades of shale gas in what has become known as the Utica shale field.
In 2009, Regis Lutz and other royalty holders sued Chesapeake, Columbia Energy Group and NiSource Inc alleging breach of contract and fraud over deductions for services that took place after the fuel left the wells on their properties. Columbia Energy Group and NiSource were subsequently dismissed from the lawsuit.
Their contracts specified royalties would be paid based on a percentage of the value at the well, and plaintiffs argued that the energy companies improperly took deductions for costs such as processing and marketing that were incurred far from the well.Read the whole article by clicking here.
To learn more about the creative accounting that Chesapeake uses to slash landowner royalties as much as possible, click here to read ProPublica's investigative report from 2013.
Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!
Follow @EnergyNewsBlog